home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_741 / 741r035.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  88KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree
OCR: FTCA a distinction that is often difficult to draw (See United States Gaubert. 499 U.S 113 Ed 2d 335 1991 FSLIC had no discretion violate the Federal Constitution since "it$ dictates are absolute and impera tive Owen City Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980) The rationale 0t discretionary immunity that is the avoidance of judicial second -guessing of legislative Or administrative acts, incompatible with the concept of constitutional torts. governmental entity has no discre- tion violate the Constitution and when federal court erters judgment based upon consi itutional violation does nat second -guess any decision nor seek interfere with any competing policy consider- ations Rather, through jud gment the courl merely enforces the absolute and imperative requirements of the Constitution 64 Fina ...